- Paul, Ron.
End the Fed.
New York: Grand Central, 2000.
ISBN 978-0-446-54919-6.
-
Imagine a company whose performance, measured over almost a century
by the primary metric given in its charter, looked
like this:
Now, would you be likely, were your own personal prosperity and that of all of
those around you on the line, to entrust your financial future to their
wisdom and demonstrated track record? Well, if you live in the United States, or
your finances are engaged in any way in that economy (whether as an investor,
creditor, or trade partner), you are, because this is the chart of
the purchasing power of the United States Dollar since it began to be managed
by the Federal Reserve System in 1913. Helluva record, don't you think?
Now, if you know anything about
basic economics
(which puts you several rungs up the ladder from most present-day
politicians and members of the chattering classes), you'll recall that
inflation is not defined as rising prices but rather an increase in the
supply of money. It's just as if you were at an auction and you gave all of
the bidders 10% more money: the selling price of the item would be 10%
greater, not because it had appreciated in value but simply because the
bidders had more to spend on acquiring it. And what is, fundamentally, the
function of the Federal Reserve System? Well, that would be to implement
an “elastic currency”, decoupled from real-world measures of
value, with the goal of smoothing out the business cycle. Looking at this
shorn of all the bafflegab, the mission statement is to create paper money
out of thin air in order to fund government programs which the legislature lacks
the spine to fund from taxation or debt, and to permit banks to profit by
extending credit well beyond the limits of prudence, knowing they're backed up
by the “lender of last resort” when things go South. The Federal
Reserve System is nothing other than an engine of inflation (money creation),
and it's hardly a surprise that the dollars it issues have lost more than 95%
of their value in the years since its foundation.
Acute observers of the economic scene have been warning about the
risks of such a system for decades—it came onto my personal
radar well before there was a human bootprint on the Moon. But somehow,
despite dollar crises, oil shocks, gold and silver bubble markets, saving and
loan collapse, dot.bomb, housing bubble, and all the rest, the wise money guys
somehow kept all of the balls in the air—until they didn't. We
are now in the early days of an extended period in which almost a century
of bogus prosperity founded on paper (not to mention, new and improved pure
zap electronic) money and debt which cannot ever be repaid will have to be
unwound. This will be painful in the extreme, and the profligate borrowers
who have been riding high whilst running up their credit cards will end up
marked down, not only in the economic realm but in geopolitical power.
Nobody imagines today that it would be possible, as Alan Greenspan envisioned
in the days he was a member of Ayn Rand's inner circle, to abolish the paper
money machine and return to honest money (or, even better, as Hayek recommended,
competing moneys, freely interchangeable in an open market). But then, nobody
imagines that the present system could collapse, which it is in the process of
doing. The US$ will continue its slide toward zero, perhaps with an inflection point
in the second derivative as the consequences of “bailouts” and
“stimuli” kick in. The Euro will first see
risk premiums
increase across sovereign debt issued by Eurozone nations, and then the
weaker members drop out to avoid the collapse of their own economies. No currency
union without political union has ever survived in the long term, and the Euro is
no exception.
Will we finally come to our senses and abandon this statist paper in favour of
the
mellow glow of gold?
This is devoutly to be wished, but I fear unlikely in my lifetime or even in
those of the koi in my pond. As long as politicians can fiddle with the money
in order to loot savers and investors to fund their patronage schemes and line
their own pockets they will: it's been going on since Babylon, and it will probably
go to the stars as we expand our dominion throughout the universe. One doesn't want
to hope for total economic and societal collapse, but that appears to be the best
bet for a return to honest and moral money. If that's your wish, I suppose you can
be heartened that the present administration in the United States appears bent upon
that outcome. Our other option is opting out with technology. We have the ability
today to electronically implement Hayek's multiple currency system online. This
has already been done by ventures such as e-gold, but The Man has, to date, effectively
stomped upon them. It will probably take a prickly sovereign state player to make
this work. Hello, Dubai!
Let me get back to this book. It is superb: read it and encourage all
of your similarly-inclined friends to do the same. If they're coming
in cold to these concepts, it may be a bit of a shock (“You
mean, the government doesn't create money?”), but
there's a bibliography at the end with three levels of reading lists
to bring people up to speed. Long-term supporters of hard money will
find this mostly a reinforcement of their views, but for those
experiencing for the first time the consequences of rapidly
depreciating dollars, this will be an eye-opening revelation of the
ultimate cause, and the malignant institution which must be abolished
to put an end to this most pernicious tax upon the most prudent of
citizens.
October 2009