« Tom Swift and His Giant Cannon Updated | Main | Keep Your Podder Dry »
Sunday, June 1, 2008
Reading List: The Dumbest Generation
- Bauerlein, Mark. The Dumbest Generation. New York: Tarcher/Penguin, 2008. ISBN 978-1-58542-639-3.
-
The generation born roughly between 1980 and 2000, sometimes dubbed
“Generation Y” or the “Millennial Generation”,
now entering the workforce, the public arena, and exerting an
ever-increasing influence in electoral politics, is the first
generation in human history to mature in an era of ubiquitous
computing, mobile communications, boundless choice in entertainment
delivered by cable and satellite, virtual environments in video games,
and the global connectivity and instant access to the human patrimony
of knowledge afforded by the Internet. In the United States, it is
the largest generational cohort ever, outnumbering the Baby Boomers
who are now beginning to scroll off the screen. Generation Y is the
richest (in terms of disposable income), most ethnically diverse, best
educated (measured by years of schooling), and the most comfortable
with new technologies and the innovative forms of social interactions
they facilitate. Books like
Millennials Rising sing
the praises of this emerging, plugged-in, globally wired
generation, and
Millennial Makeover
(May 2008)
eagerly anticipates the influence they will have
on politics and the culture.
To those of us who interact with members of this generation
regularly through E-mail, Web logs, comments on Web sites,
and personal Web pages, there seems to be a dissonant chord
in this symphony of technophilic optimism. To be blunt,
the kids are clueless. They may be able to multi-task,
juggling mobile phones, SMS text messages, instant Internet
messages (E-mail is so Mom and Dad!), social
networking sites, Twitter, search engines, peer-to-peer
downloads, surfing six hundred cable channels with nothing
on while listening to an iPod and playing a video game,
but when you scratch beneath the monomolecular layer of
frantic media consumption and social interaction with
their peers, there's, as we say on the Web,
no content—they appear
to be almost entirely ignorant of history, culture, the
fine arts, civics, politics, science, economics, mathematics,
and all of the other difficult yet rewarding aspects of
life which distinguish a productive and intellectually
engaged adult from a superannuated child. But then one
worries that one's just muttering the perennial complaints
of curmudgeonly old fogies and that, after all, the kids
are all right. There are, indeed, those who argue that
Everything Bad Is
Good for You: that video games and pop culture
are refining the cognitive, decision-making, and moral
skills of youth immersed in them to never before attained
levels.
But why are they so clueless, then? Well, maybe
they aren't really, and Burgess Shale relics like me have
simply forgotten how little we knew about the real world
at that age. Errr…actually, no—this book, written
by a professor of English at Emory University and former
director of research and analysis for the National Endowment
for the Arts, who experiences first-hand the cognitive capacities
and intellectual endowment of those Millennials who arrive in his
classroom every year, draws upon a wealth of recent research
(the bibliography is 18 pages long) by government
agencies, foundations, and market research organisations,
all without any apparent agenda to promote, which documents
the abysmal levels of knowledge and the ability to apply it
among present-day teenagers and young adults in the U.S.
If there is good news, it is that the new media technologies
have not caused a precipitous collapse in objective measures
of outcomes overall (although there are disturbing statistics
in some regards, including book reading and attendance at
performing arts events). But, on the other hand, the
unprecedented explosion in technology and the maturing
generation's affinity for it and facility in using it have
produced absolutely no objective improvement in their
intellectual performance on a wide spectrum of metrics.
Further, absorption in these new technologies has further
squeezed out time which youth of earlier generations spent
in activities which furthered intellectual development
such as reading for enjoyment, visiting museums and historical
sites, attending and participating in the performing
arts, and tinkering in the garage or basement. This was compounded
by the dumbing down and evisceration of traditional content
in the secondary school curriculum.
The sixties generation's leaders didn't anticipate how their claim of exceptionalism would affect the next generation, and the next, but the sequence was entirely logical. Informed rejection of the past became uninformed rejection of the past, and then complete and unworried ignorance of it. (p. 228)
And it is the latter which is particularly disturbing: as documented extensively, Generation Y knows they're clueless and they're cool with it! In fact, their expectations for success in their careers are entirely discordant with the qualifications they're packing as they venture out to slide down the razor blade of life (pp. 193–198). Or not: on pp. 169–173 we meet the “Twixters”, urban and suburban middle class college graduates between 22 and 30 years old who are still living with their parents and engaging in an essentially adolescent lifestyle: bouncing between service jobs with no career advancement path and settling into no long-term relationship. These sad specimens who refuse to grow up even have their own term of derision: “KIPPERS” Kids In Parents' Pockets Eroding Retirement Savings. In evaluating the objective data and arguments presented here, it's important to keep in mind that correlation does not imply causation. One cannot run controlled experiments on broad-based social trends: only try to infer from the evidence available what might be the cause of the objective outcomes one measures. Many of the characteristics of Generation Y described here might be explained in large part simply by the immersion and isolation of young people in the pernicious peer culture described by Robert Epstein in The Case Against Adolescence (July 2007), with digital technologies simply reinforcing a dynamic in effect well before their emergence, and visible to some extent in the Boomer and Generation X cohorts who matured earlier, without being plugged in 24/7. For another insightful view of Generation Y (by another professor at Emory!), see I'm the Teacher, You're the Student (January 2005). If Millennial Makeover is correct, the culture and politics of the United States is soon to be redefined by the generation now coming of age. This book presents a disturbing picture of what that may entail: a generation with little or no knowledge of history or of the culture of the society they've inherited, and unconcerned with their ignorance, making decisions not in the context of tradition and their intellectual heritage, but of peer popular culture. Living in Europe, it is clear that things have not reached such a dire circumstance here, and in Asia the intergenerational intellectual continuity appears to remain strong. But then, the U.S. was the first adopter of the wired society, and hence may simply be the first to arrive at the scene of the accident. Observing what happens there in the near future may give the rest of the world a chance to change course before their own dumbest generations mature. Paraphrasing Ronald Reagan, the author notes that “Knowledge is never more than one generation away from oblivion.” (p. 186) In an age where a large fraction of all human knowledge is freely accessible to anybody in a fraction of a second, what a tragedy it would be if the “digital natives” ended up, like the pejoratively denigrated “natives” of the colonial era, surrounded by a wealth of culture but ignorant of and uninterested in it. The final chapter is a delightful and stirring defence of culture wars and culture warriors, which argues that only those grounded in knowledge of their culture and equipped with the intellectual tools to challenge accepted norms and conventional wisdom can (for better or worse) change society. Those who lack the knowledge and reasoning skills to be engaged culture warriors are putty in the hands of marketeers and manipulative politicians, which is perhaps why so many of them are salivating over the impending Millennial majority.
Posted at June 1, 2008 23:59