- Boykin, William G. and Tom Morrisey.
Kiloton Threat.
Nashville: B&H Books, 2011.
ISBN 978-0-8054-4954-9.
-
William G. Boykin retired from the U.S. Army in 2007 with the rank
of Lieutenant General, having been a founding member of Delta
Force and served with that special operations unit from 1978
through 1993, then as Commanding General of the U.S. Army Special
Forces Command. He also served as Deputy Director of Special
Activities in the CIA and Deputy Undersecretary of Defense
for Intelligence. When it comes to special operations, this is
somebody who knows what he's talking about.
Something distinctly odd is going on in Iran—their
nuclear weapons-related and missile development sites seem
be blowing up on a regular basis for no apparent reason, and
there are suspicions that shadowy forces may be in play to
try to block Iran's becoming a nuclear armed power with
the ability to deliver weapons with ballistic missiles. Had
the U.S. decided to pursue such a campaign during the Bush
administration, General Boykin would have been one of the people
around the table planning the operations, so in this tale of
operations in an Iran at the nuclear threshold he brings an
encyclopedic knowledge not just of the special
operations community but of the contending powers in Iran and
the military capability at their disposal. The result is a
thriller which may not have the kind of rock-em sock-em action
of a
Vince Flynn or
Brad Thor
novel, but exudes an authenticity comparable to a police procedural
written by a thirty year veteran of the force.
In this novel, Iran has completed its long-sought goal to acquire
nuclear weapons and intelligence indicates its intention to launch
a preemptive strike against Israel, with the potential to
provoke a regional if not global nuclear conflict. A senior figure
in Iran's nuclear program has communicated his intent to defect and
deliver the details necessary to avert the attack before it is
launched, and CIA agent Blake Kershaw is paired with an Iranian
émigré who can guide him through the country and
provide access to the community in which the official resides.
The mission goes horribly wrong (something with which author Boykin has
direct personal experience, having been operations officer for the
botched
Iranian hostage rescue operation
in 1980), and while Kershaw
manages to get the defector out of the country, he leaves behind a person
he solemnly promised to get out and is forced, from a sense of honour,
to return to an Iran buzzing like a beehive whacked with a baseball
bat, without official sanction, to rescue that person, then act
independently to put an end to the threat.
There are a few copy editing goofs, but nothing that detracts from the
story. The only factual errors I noted were the assertion
that Ahmadinejad used the Quds Force “in much the same
way as Hitler used the Waffen-SS” (the
Waffen-SS was a
multinational military force; the
Allgemeine SS
is the closest parallel to the Quds Force) and that a
Cessna Caravan's
“turboprop spun up to starting speed and caught with a ragged
roar” (like all turboprops, there's only a smooth rising whine as
the engine spools up; I've
flown on these planes,
and there's no “ragged roar”). Boykin and co-author Morrisey are committed
Christians and express their faith on several occasions in the novel; radical
secularists may find this irritating, but I didn't find it intrusive.
I have no idea whether the recent apparent kinetic energy transients at
strategic sites in Iran are the work of special operators infiltrated into
that country and, if so, who they're working for. But if they are, this
book by the fellow all of the U.S. Army black ops people reported to just
a few years ago provides excellent insights on how it might be done.
- Larson, Erik.
In the Garden of Beasts.
New York: Crown Publishers, 2011.
ISBN 978-0-307-40884-6.
-
Ambassadors to high-profile postings are usually chosen from
political patrons and contributors to the president
who appoints them, depending upon career Foreign Service officers
to provide the in-country expertise needed to carry out their
mandate. Newly-elected Franklin Roosevelt intended to follow
this tradition in choosing his ambassador to Germany, where Hitler
had just taken power, but discovered that none of the candidates
he approached were interested in being sent to represent the
U.S. in Nazi Germany. William E. Dodd, a professor of history
and chairman of the department of history at the University of
Chicago, growing increasingly frustrated with his administrative
duties preventing him from completing his life's work: a comprehensive
history of the ante-bellum American South, mentioned to a friend
in Roosevelt's inner circle that he'd be interested in an
appointment as ambassador to a country like Belgium or the
Netherlands, where he thought his ceremonial obligations would be
sufficiently undemanding that he could concentrate on his
scholarly work.
Dodd was astonished when Roosevelt contacted him directly and
offered him the ambassadorship to Germany. Roosevelt appealed
to Dodd's fervent New Deal sympathies, and argued that in such a
position he could be an exemplar of American liberal values in
a regime hostile to them. Dodd realised from the outset that
a mission to Berlin would doom his history project, but accepted
because he agreed with Roosevelt's goal and also because FDR was
a very persuasive person. His nomination was sent to the Senate
and confirmed the very same day.
Dodd brought his whole family along on the adventure: wife Mattie
and adult son and daughter Bill and Martha. Dodd arrived in Berlin
with an open mind toward the recently-installed Nazi regime. He was
inclined to dismiss the dark view of the career embassy staff and
instead adopt what might be called today “smart diplomacy”,
deceiving himself into believing that by setting an example and
scolding the Nazi slavers he could shame them into civilised behaviour.
He immediately found himself at odds not only with the Nazis but also his
own embassy staff: he railed against the excesses of diplomatic
expense, personally edited the verbose dispatches composed by his
staff to save telegraph charges, and drove his own aged Chevrolet,
shipped from the U.S., to diplomatic functions where all of
the other ambassadors arrived in stately black limousines.
Meanwhile, daughter Martha
embarked upon her own version of
Girl Gone Wild—Third Reich Edition. Initially
exhilarated by the New Germany and swept into its social whirl,
before long she was carrying on simultaneous affairs with
the
head of the Gestapo
and a Soviet NKVD agent operating under diplomatic cover in
Berlin, among others.
Those others included
Ernst “Putzi” Hanfstaengl,
who tried to set her up with Hitler (nothing came of it; they met at lunch and that
was it).
Martha's trajectory through life was extraordinary. After affairs with the
head of the Gestapo and one of Hitler's inner circle, she
was recruited by the
NKVD and spied on behalf
of the Soviet Union in Berlin and after her return to the U.S. It is not
clear that she provided anything of value to the Soviets, as she had
no access to state secrets during this period. With investigations of
her Soviet affiliations intensifying in the early 1950s, in 1956 she fled
with her American husband and son to Prague, Czechoslovakia where they lived
until her death in 1990 (they may have spent some time in Cuba, and
apparently applied for Soviet citizenship and were denied it).
Dodd père was much quicker to figure out the true nature of the
Nazi regime. Following Roosevelt's charge to represent American values,
he spoke out against the ever-increasing Nazi domination of every aspect
of German society, and found himself at odds with the patrician
“Pretty Good Club” at the State Department who wished to
avoid making waves, regardless of how malevolent and brutal the adversary
might be. Today, we'd call them the “reset button crowd”. Even
Dodd found the daily influence of immersion in
gleichschaltung
difficult to resist. On several occasions he complained of the influence
of Jewish members of his staff and the difficulties they posed in dealing
with the Nazi regime.
This book focuses upon the first two years of Dodd's tenure as ambassador
in Berlin, as that was the time in which the true nature of the regime
became apparent to him and he decided upon his policy of distancing
himself from it: for example, refusing to attend any Nazi party-related
events such as the Nuremberg rallies. It provides an insightful view of
how seductive a totalitarian regime can be to outsiders who see only
its bright-eyed marching supporters, while ignoring the violence which
sustains it, and how utterly futile “constructive engagement” is
with barbarians that share no common values with civilisation.
Thanks to
James Lileks
for
suggesting this book.
- Cawdron, Peter.
Anomaly.
Los Gatos, CA: Smashwords, 2011.
ISBN 978-1-4657-7394-4.
-
One otherwise perfectly normal day, a sphere of space 130 metres in
diameter outside the headquarters of the United Nations in New York
including a slab of pavement and a corner of the General Assembly
building becomes detached from Earth's local reference
frame and begins to rotate, maintaining a fixed orientation with
respect to the distant stars, returning to its original orientation
once per sidereal day. Observers watch in awe as the massive slab of
pavement, severed corner of the U.N. building, and even flagpoles
and flags which happened to fall within the sphere defy gravity and
common sense, turning on end, passing overhead, and then coming back
to their original orientation every day.
Through a strange set of coincidences, schoolteacher David Teller,
who first realised and blurted out on live television that the
anomaly wasn't moving as it appeared to Earth dwellers, but rather
was stationary with respect to the stars, and third-string TV news
reporter Cathy Jones find themselves the public face of the scientific
investigation of the anomaly, conducted by NASA under the direction
of the imposing James Mason, “Director of National Security”.
An off-the-cuff experiment shows that the anomaly has its own local
gravitational field pointing in the original direction, down toward the
slab, and that no barrier separates the inside and outside of the
anomaly. Teller does the acrobatics to climb onto the slab, using a
helium balloon to detect the up direction as he enters into the
anomaly, and observers outside see him standing, perfectly at ease, at
a crazy angle to their own sense of vertical. Sparked by a sudden
brainstorm, Teller does a simple experiment to test whether the anomaly
might be an alien probe attempting to make contact, and the results
set off a sequence of events which, although implausible at times, never
cease to be entertaining and raise the question of whether if we encountered
technologies millions or billions of years more advanced than our own,
we would even distinguish them from natural phenomena (and, conversely,
whether some of the conundrums scientists puzzle over today might be
evidence of such technologies—“dark energy”, anyone?).
The prospect of first contact sets off a firestorm: bureaucratic
turf battles, media struggling for access,
religious leaders trying to put their own spin on what it means,
nations seeking to avoid being cut out of a potential bounty of
knowledge from contact by the U.S., upon whose territory the
anomaly happened to appear. These forces converge toward a conclusion
which will have you saying every few pages, “I didn't see
that coming”, and one of the most unlikely military
confrontations in all of the literature of science fiction and thrillers.
As explained in the after-word, the author is trying to do something
special in this story, which I shall not reveal here to avoid spoiling
your figuring it out for yourself and making your own decision as to
how well he succeeded.
At just 50,000 words, this is a short novel, but it tells its story
well. At this writing, the Kindle edition sells for just US$0.99 (no
print edition is available), so it's a bargain notwithstanding its
brevity.
- Tarnoff, Ben.
Moneymakers.
New York: Penguin, 2011.
ISBN 978-1-101-46732-9.
-
Many people think of early America as a time of virtuous
people, hard work, and sound money, all of which have been
debased in our decadent age. Well, there may have been plenty
of the first two, but the fact is that from the colonial era
through the War of Secession, the American economy was built
upon a foundation of dodgy paper money issued by a
bewildering variety of institutions. There were advocates of
hard money during the epoch, but their voices went largely
unheeded because there simply wasn't enough precious metal
on the continent to coin or back currency in the quantity
required by the burgeoning economy. Not until the discovery
of gold in California and silver in Nevada and other western
states in the middle of the 19th century did a metal-backed
monetary system become feasible in America.
Now, whenever authorities, be they colonies, banks, states, or
federal institutions, undertake the economic transubstantiation of
paper into gold by printing something on it, there will
always be enterprising individuals motivated to get into the
business for themselves. This book tells the story
of three of these “moneymakers” (as counterfeiters
were called in early America).
Owen Sullivan was an Irish immigrant who, in the 1740s and '50s set up
shop in a well-appointed cave on the border between New York and
Connecticut and orchestrated a network of printers, distributors, and
passers of bogus notes of the surrounding colonies. Sullivan
was the quintessential golden-tongued confidence man, talking himself
out of jam after jam, and even persuading his captors, when he was
caught and sentenced to be branded with an “R” for
“Rogue” to brand him above the hairline where he
could comb over the mark of shame.
So painful had the colonial experience with paper money been that
the U.S. Constitution
forbade states
to “emit Bills of Credit; make
any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts”.
But as the long and sordid history of “limited government”
demonstrates, wherever there is a constitutional constraint, there
is always a clever way for politicians to evade it, and nothing in
the Constitution prevented states from chartering banks which would
then proceed to print their own paper money. When the charter
of Alexander Hamilton's
First
Bank of the United States was allowed to expire, that's exactly
what the states proceeded to do. In Pennsylvania alone, in the single
year of 1814, the state legislature chartered forty-one new banks in
addition to the six already existing. With each of these banks entitled
to print its own paper money (backed, in theory, by gold and silver coin
in their vaults, with the emphasis on in theory), and each of
these notes having its own unique design, this created a veritable paradise
for counterfeiters, and into this paradise stepped counterfeiting
entrepreneur
David Lewis
and master engraver Philander Noble, who set up a distributed and
decentralised gang to pass their wares which could only be brought to
justice by the kind of patient, bottom-up detective work which was
rare in an age where law enforcement was largely the work of
amateurs.
Samuel Upham,
a successful Philadelphia shopkeeper in the 1860s, saw
counterfeiting as a new product line for his shop, along with
stationery and Upham's Hair Dye. When the Philadelphia Inquirer
printed a replica of the Confederate five dollar note, the edition was
much in demand at Upham's shop, and he immediately got in touch with
the newspaper and arranged to purchase the printing plate for the
crude replica of the note and printed three thousand copies with a
strip at the bottom identifying them as replicas with the name and
address of his store. At a penny a piece they sold briskly, and
Upham decided to upgrade and expand his product line. Before long
he offered Confederate currency “curios” in all
denominations, printed from high quality plates on banknote paper,
advertised widely as available in retail and wholesale quantities
for those seeking a souvenir of the war (or several thousand of
them, if you like). These “facsimiles” were indistinguishable
from the real thing to anybody but an expert, and Union troops heading
South and merchants trading across the border found Upham's counterfeits
easy to pass. Allegations were made that the Union encouraged, aided,
and abetted Upham's business in the interest of economic warfare against
the South, but no evidence of this was ever produced. Nonetheless,
Upham and his inevitable competitors were allowed to operate with
impunity, and the flood of bogus money they sent to the South certainly
made a major contribution to the rampant inflation experienced in the
South and made it more difficult for the Confederacy to finance its
war effort.
This is an illuminating and entertaining exploration of banking,
finance, and monetary history in what may seem a simpler age but
was, in its own way, breathtakingly complicated—at the
peak there were more than ten thousand different kinds of
paper money circulating in North America. Readers with a sense of
justice may find themselves wondering why small-scale operators
such as Sullivan and Lewis were tracked down so assiduously and
punished so harshly while contemporary manufacturers of
funny money on the terabuck scale such as Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner, and Mario Draghi
are treated with respect and deference instead of being dispatched
to the pillory and branding iron they so richly deserve for plundering
the savings and future of those from whom their salaries are extorted
under threat of force. To whom I say, just wait….
A Kindle edition is available, in
which the table of contents is linked
to the text, but the index is simply a list of terms, not
linked to their occurrences in the text. The extensive end notes are
keyed to page numbers in the print edition, which are
preserved in the Kindle edition, making navigation
possible, albeit clumsy.
- Chivers, C. J.
The Gun.
New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010.
ISBN 978-0-7432-7173-8.
-
Ever since the introduction of firearms into infantry combat,
technology and military doctrine have co-evolved to optimise
the effectiveness of the weapons carried by the individual
soldier. This process requires choosing a compromise among a
long list of desiderata including accuracy, range, rate of fire,
stopping power, size, weight (of both the weapon and its
ammunition, which determines how many rounds an infantryman can
carry), reliability, and the degree of training required to
operate the weapon in both normal and abnormal circumstances.
The “sweet spot” depends upon the technology available
at the time (for example, smokeless powder allowed replacing heavy,
low muzzle velocity, large calibre rounds with lighter supersonic
ammunition), and the environment in which the weapon will be used
(long range and high accuracy over great distances are largely
wasted in jungle and urban combat, where most engagements are
close-up and personal).
Still, ever since the advent of infantry firearms, the rate
of fire an individual soldier can sustain has been
considered a key force multiplier. All things being equal,
a solider who can fire sixteen rounds per minute can do the work
of four soldiers equipped with muzzle loading arms which can
fire only four rounds a minute. As infantry arms progressed from
muzzle loaders to breech loaders to magazine fed lever and bolt actions,
the sustained rate of fire steadily increased. The logical
endpoint of this evolution was a fully automatic infantry weapon:
a rifle which, as long as the trigger was held down and
ammunition remained, would continue to send rounds downrange at
a high cyclic rate. Such a rifle could also be fired in
semiautomatic mode, firing one round every time the trigger
was pulled without any other intervention by the rifleman other
than to change magazines as they were emptied.
This book traces the history of automatic weapons from primitive
volley guns;
through the
Gatling gun,
the first successful high rate of fire weapon (although with
the size and weight of a field artillery piece and requiring
a crew to hand crank it and feed ammunition, it was hardly an
infantry weapon); the
Maxim gun, the
first true machine gun which was responsible for much of the carnage
in World War I; to the
Thompson
submachine gun, which could be carried and fired by a single
person but, using pistol ammunition, lacked the range and stopping
power of an infantry rifle. At the end of World War II, the vast
majority of soldiers carried bolt action or semiautomatic weapons:
fully automatic fire was restricted to crew served support weapons
operated by specially trained gunners.
As military analysts reviewed combat as it happened on the ground
in the battles of World War II, they discovered that long range
aimed fire played only a small part in infantry actions. Instead,
infantry weapons had been used mostly at relatively short ranges
to lay down
suppressive
fire. In this application, rate of fire and the amount of
ammunition a soldier can carry into combat come to the top of
the priority list. Based upon this analysis, even before the end of
the war Soviet armourers launched a design competition for a
next generation rifle which would put automatic fire into the hands
of the ordinary infantryman. After grueling tests under all kinds
of extreme conditions such a weapon might encounter in the field,
the
AK-47, initially
designed by
Mikhail Kalashnikov,
a sergeant tank commander injured in battle, was selected. In 1956 the AK-47
became the standard issue rifle of the Soviet Army, and it and
its subsequent variants, the
AKM (an improved design which
was also lighter and less expensive to manufacture—most of the
weapons one sees today which are called “AK-47s” are
actually based on the AKM design), and the smaller calibre
AK-74. These weapons
and the multitude of clones and variants produced around the world
have become the archetypal small arms of the latter half of the
twentieth century and are likely to remain so for the foreseeable
future in the twenty-first. Nobody knows how many were produced but
almost certainly the number exceeds 100 million, and given the
ruggedness and reliability of the design, most remain operational
today.
This weapon, designed to outfit forces charged with maintaining
order in the Soviet Empire and expanding it to new territories,
quickly slipped the leash and began to circulate among insurgent
forces around the globe—initially infiltrated by Soviet and
Eastern bloc countries to equip communist revolutionaries, an
“after-market” quickly developed which allowed almost
any force wishing to challenge an established power to obtain a weapon
and ammunition which made its irregular fighters the peer of
professional troops. The worldwide dissemination of AK weapons
and their availability at low cost has been a powerful force
destabilising regimes which before could keep their people down with
a relatively small professional army. The author recounts the
legacy of the AK in incidents over the decades and around the
world, and the tragic consequences for those who have found themselves
on the wrong end of this formidable weapon.
United States forces first encountered the AK first hand in
Vietnam, and quickly realised that their
M14
rifles, an attempt to field a full automatic infantry
weapon which used the cartridge of a main battle rifle,
was too large, heavy, and limiting in the amount of ammunition
a soldier could carry to stand up to the AK. The M14's only
advantages: long range and accuracy, were irrelevant in the
Vietnam jungle. While the Soviet procurement and development
of the AK-47 was deliberate and protracted, Pentagon whiz kids
in the U.S. rushed the radically new
M16 into
production and the hands of U.S. troops in Vietnam. The
new rifle, inadequately tested in the field conditions it would
encounter, and deployed with ammunition different from that used
in the test phase, failed frequently and disastrously in the hands
of combat troops with results which were often tragic. What
was supposed to be the most advanced infantry weapon on the planet
often ended up being used as bayonet mount or club by troops in
their last moments of life. The Pentagon responded to this disaster
in the making by covering up the entire matter and destroying the
careers of those who attempted to speak out. Eventually reports
from soldiers in the field made their way to newspapers and
congressmen and the truth began to come out. It took years for
the problems of the M16 to be resolved, and to this day the M16 is
considered less reliable (although more accurate) than the AK.
As an example, compare what it takes to
field strip an M16
compared to an
AK-47. The entire ugly saga of the M16 is documented
in detail here.
This is a fascinating account of the origins, history, and impact
of the small arms which dominate the world today. The author does
an excellent job of sorting through the many legends (especially
from the Soviet era) surrounding these weapons, and sketching
the singular individuals behind their creation.
In the Kindle edition, the table of
contents, end notes, and index are all properly linked to the
text. All of the photographic illustrations are collected at the
very end, after the index.